Mohana Ravindranath | Nextgov | May 9, 2017 | 0 Comments

Federal Spending Data is Due: Is Anyone Making Deadline?

Peeradach Rattanakoses/

Three years after the Digital Accountability and Transparency Act was signed, federal agencies are uploading their financial data to, an effort to make government operations more transparent to the public.

A beta version of the site, where some of that data is currently accessible, was launched Tuesday by the Treasury Department and Amazon Web Services. Treasury, along with the Office of Management and Budget, is tasked with implementing the DATA Act.

Agencies are still racing to meet the May 9 deadline. Most appear to have reported some data, even if only partially, according to Treasury’s data directory. But missed deadlines and imperfect compliance won’t be a surprise: watchdog reports suggested as much.

For instance, several inspector general audits conducted last year concluded at least three wouldn’t meet the deadline, and another dozen hadn’t said if they would or would not. The Government Accountability Office also concluded OMB and Treasury aren’t using agencies’ internal audits to help gauge their financial transparency audits.

» Get the best federal technology news and ideas delivered right to your inbox. Sign up here.

Treasury may not immediately be able to assess compliance, Treasury’s Deputy Assistant Secretary for Accounting Policy and Financial Transparency Christina Ho said at a Data Coalition event last month.

“A lot of things could have happened” after audits predicted agencies would miss the deadline, and “it will take a few days to see whether we’ll get all the data," she said. 

Publicly traded organizations are often required to share their financial data. So why is compliance so hard for federal agencies? The problems appear to be cultural and technological, according to transparency experts.

One barrier is that agencies often keep their financial and budget spending separate from the contracts and award spending, and sometimes have multiple databases for each of those categories, Hudson Hollister, founder and executive director of the transparency advocacy group the Data Coalition, told Nextgov.

“In most big agencies, the [chief financial officer] runs the former, and the deputy secretary for management runs the latter,” he said. Until the DATA Act required agencies to report both, “we have never been able to connect those two categories.”

The congressional appropriations process for agencies can also be much more complex to report than the funding received by private-sector organizations, Hollister suggested.

In earlier versions of, OMB couldn’t assure the quality of the data agencies were submitting, Robert Shea, associate director for management under President George W. Bush, told Nextgov. Shea, now a principal at Grant Thornton, was responsible for launching the first iteration of the site.

“We didn't have controls ... with which to assess whether or not all we reported was all we should have been reporting,” he said. “We asked agencies to produce data quality plans—all of them certified that their data was of high quality, but it wasn’t. The data was quite unreliable … [and] had some personally identifiable information in it.”

The bigger challenge, Shea said, was that agencies don’t always grasp how the public will use the data.

“They resent having to work heroically to produce information [when] they're not sure what use will be made of it,” he said. Some don’t always believe there’s a “benefit to the transparency alone, irrespective of what analysis will be made.”

And the data isn’t just for the public. President Donald Trump’s administration is especially interested in any case studies that emerge from the massive aggregation of federal spending data, Matt Lira, special assistant to the president for innovation policy and initiatives, told a hackathon audience last month.

Lira, staffed on Trump’s White House Office of American Innovation, noted the interagency collaboration the DATA Act requires could also be a model for “broader modernization of the federal government.”


Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Modernizing IT for Mission Success

    Surveying Federal and Defense Leaders on Priorities and Challenges at the Tactical Edge

  • Communicating Innovation in Federal Government

    Federal Government spending on ‘obsolete technology’ continues to increase. Supporting the twin pillars of improved digital service delivery for citizens on the one hand, and the increasingly optimized and flexible working practices for federal employees on the other, are neither easy nor inexpensive tasks. This whitepaper explores how federal agencies can leverage the value of existing agency technology assets while offering IT leaders the ability to implement the kind of employee productivity, citizen service improvements and security demanded by federal oversight.

  • Effective Ransomware Response

    This whitepaper provides an overview and understanding of ransomware and how to successfully combat it.

  • Forecasting Cloud's Future

    Conversations with Federal, State, and Local Technology Leaders on Cloud-Driven Digital Transformation

  • IT Transformation Trends: Flash Storage as a Strategic IT Asset

    MIT Technology Review: Flash Storage As a Strategic IT Asset For the first time in decades, IT leaders now consider all-flash storage as a strategic IT asset. IT has become a new operating model that enables self-service with high performance, density and resiliency. It also offers the self-service agility of the public cloud combined with the security, performance, and cost-effectiveness of a private cloud. Download this MIT Technology Review paper to learn more about how all-flash storage is transforming the data center.


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.