Frank Konkel | Nextgov | July 19, 2016 | 0 Comments

Is Pentagon’s Push to a Joint Information Environment in Trouble?


The Pentagon announced the Joint Information Environment in 2010 as a massive effort to consolidate an IT infrastructure that supports more than 2 million military active duty and civilian personnel around the world.

But a recent audit from the Government Accountability Office – released six years into JIE – suggests the modernization effort lacks a management plan: Defense officials can’t project what it might cost because of its complexity, and officials disagree over what is or isn’t included under JIE.

The Pentagon estimates it spent $900 million from fiscal 2013-2016 on JIE and anticipates another $1.6 billion will go toward it through fiscal 2021. But DOD has yet to develop an estimate of the cost to adopt JIE, according to GAO, because of the “size and complexity of DOD infrastructure and JIE’s implementation approach.”

Not knowing how much an effort as impactful as JIE costs essentially keeps Congress from providing meaningful oversight, GAO said.  

» Get the best federal technology news and ideas delivered right to your inbox. Sign up here.

In addition, “DOD has not effectively defined or managed JIE’s scope,” the audit states, referencing differences in what a 2013 JIE implementation strategy called for and what DOD officials told congressional staff two years later.  

The implementation strategy called for software application rational and desktop virtualization as part of JIE, yet briefings to congressional staff and GAO did not include those elements. However, they did include new ones, including “mission partner environment” and “strategic sourcing.” That differs from what the current version of the JIE adoption plan says, GAO argues.

The audit makes clear that stakeholders – which include the U.S. military branches – already have plenty of questions. One of the key pillars to JIE is implementing the Joint Regional Security Stacks, which aim to replace some 1,000 legacy network security stacks with 48 standardized stacks at 25 worldwide locations. JRSS is vital to the Pentagon’s cybersecurity posture, cutting the number of networks vulnerable to cyberattacks and promoting a single security architecture.

But what about after JRSS is done?

“Marine Corps officials told us that they were concerned that a strategy was not in place to lay out what is next beyond the Joint Regional Security Stacks,” the audit states. “They also added that JIE is to include consolidation of applications and data into centralized data centers, but that it was not clear how this fits in with the overall strategy.”

In the audit, DOD contended it plans to revamp JIE’s governance structure, process, management and planning, yet GAO nonetheless included nine recommendations in the report. In its formal response, DOD “partially concurred” with GAO’s recommendations, outlining steps it is taking to adhere to them.

To conclude the audit, GAO expressed concern over the Pentagon’s outlined steps to meet the recommendations, suggesting they “may not be sufficient.”


Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Modernizing IT for Mission Success

    Surveying Federal and Defense Leaders on Priorities and Challenges at the Tactical Edge

  • Communicating Innovation in Federal Government

    Federal Government spending on ‘obsolete technology’ continues to increase. Supporting the twin pillars of improved digital service delivery for citizens on the one hand, and the increasingly optimized and flexible working practices for federal employees on the other, are neither easy nor inexpensive tasks. This whitepaper explores how federal agencies can leverage the value of existing agency technology assets while offering IT leaders the ability to implement the kind of employee productivity, citizen service improvements and security demanded by federal oversight.

  • Effective Ransomware Response

    This whitepaper provides an overview and understanding of ransomware and how to successfully combat it.

  • Forecasting Cloud's Future

    Conversations with Federal, State, and Local Technology Leaders on Cloud-Driven Digital Transformation

  • IT Transformation Trends: Flash Storage as a Strategic IT Asset

    MIT Technology Review: Flash Storage As a Strategic IT Asset For the first time in decades, IT leaders now consider all-flash storage as a strategic IT asset. IT has become a new operating model that enables self-service with high performance, density and resiliency. It also offers the self-service agility of the public cloud combined with the security, performance, and cost-effectiveness of a private cloud. Download this MIT Technology Review paper to learn more about how all-flash storage is transforming the data center.


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.